Home > gadgets > Battle Of The Mid-Range Windows Phones On T-Mobile, Dogfight!

Battle Of The Mid-Range Windows Phones On T-Mobile, Dogfight!

Screen Shot 2012-01-18 at 2.39.57 PM

Oh how I do love a good dogfight around these parts and this time we’re happy our man Aaron Baker took the time to compare the two newest Windows Phone devices on T-Mobile. It’s a battle of the mid-range devices, but in Windows Phone terminology, mid-range doesn’t have the same negative connotation one might consider when looking at say, a mid-range… Read more

View full post on TmoNews

POSTED ON January 18, 2012, , , , , ,

Comments:3

Leave my own
  1. tmoguy1 Reply
    12/01/18

    I own a Radar, and recently got the Nokia. The Radar feels like a better built phone (but looks odd- 2 tone white against brushed aluminum). Nokia feels a little cheeper, but the screen seems slightly better and the colors really pop. Neither has an amazing camera, but to get a great camera on a new phone you have to but a Samsung Galaxy S2, HTC Amaze, Or Iphone (I’m sure there are others out there) which are all far more expensive.

    The Best thing about the Windows phones (and I really have to give them credit here) is that no matter how cheep the device may seem (low end, mid tier, etc) the software is the same and runs very well so you do not feel like you are losing anything in the experience.

    Working at a store, I can see why we are selling out of these phones, and why we have never had a return on a Radar (and so far not on Lumia either).

  2. Not ice_fusion. Reply
    12/01/18

    900 holdout here, too!

  3. Anonymous Reply
    12/01/18

    Radar is a odd looking piece of hardware, and only in white? Great otherwise, but it sure looks odd. I handled the Nokia and was impressed. I’ll wait for the 900 thankyouverymuch.

Leave a Reply

Trackbacks:0

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
Battle Of The Mid-Range Windows Phones On T-Mobile, Dogfight! from Funlimited
TOP