Home > gadgets > Blatant IP Theft In App Store Garners Little Response From Apple (Updated)

Blatant IP Theft In App Store Garners Little Response From Apple (Updated)


One of the criticisms of Apple’s App Store (and application stores in general) is how it is commonplace for a popular app or game to have dozens of clones. These can be sifted through due to their low popularity and shoddy icons, and on the off chance you prefer an ad-supported knock-off over a 99 cent app, they’re a good alternative. But not every clone is flattery and bandwagon-jumping; some are outright theft. Case in point, an iOS game entitled The Blocks Cometh, which is a straight lift, graphics and all, of a Flash game of the same name by developer Halfbot. The original is at left, above, and the clone at right.

The iOS app has been approved and is available to buy now, though of course you shouldn’t buy it (Halfbot is working on an actual iOS port). A week ago, they notified Apple that the game was clearly made entirely from stolen IP (the character sprite was stolen from another game, The League Of Evil), which isn’t surprising, as the rest of the offending developer’s games seem to be knock-offs as well. But a week later, Apple has yet to pull the app or give any kind of substantial response.

Now, it’s easy for us to snipe at Apple from here, since we’re not in charge of executing the distribution of hundreds of thousands of discrete applications. But as I pointed out when Facebook made a similar seemingly minor lapse and foreclosed on a perfectly legitimate fan page, if they are unwilling to take responsibility for the ecosystem they’ve created, that’s worthy of serious rebuke. In this case, Apple is failing to address the very pressing concerns of on of their most important demographics: independent developers. Melvin Samuel at Halfbot, whom I asked for comment regarding all this, expressed concern over the lack of real feedback from Apple. Legal recourse could be taken, but shouldn’t developers have a direct line to publishers in cases like this?

If Apple will take responsibility for the app by approving it, they must also assume responsibility when they have made a mistake doing so, properly and in good time, and follow through when something like this IP hijacking takes place. That’s called paying the cost to be the boss. If they can’t or won’t do that, well, at the very least, developers will start to get the feeling they’re not appreciated, and that the App Store isn’t the level playing field it’s advertised as (an optimistic fiction to begin with). That’s not something Apple can risk.

Like I said with the Facebook fan-page shutdown, it’s not the actual scale or content in these situations that makes them important. It’s that we are responsible for keeping institutions like Apple and Facebook on their toes, and to do that it’s necessary to make a scene now and then. Casual injustices like this brazen theft of an indie developer’s hard work mustn’t be allowed to be swept under the rug.

Update: The offending app was pulled the evening after this article (along with others like it around the net) was posted. I should clarify that I am not advising or disadvising certain legal actions or consequences. This is about Apple and companies like Apple continuing to provide a healthy ecosystem. To sue or not to sue is the prerogative of the injured party, but to alert Apple and expect a timely and relevant response is the privilege of a licensed developer and customer. It’s our job to keep Apple (and Facebook et al.) on their toes when stuff like this slips by under the radar. We can’t do it every time (a commenter notes that an app of his was recently duplicated as well) but we can do our best to make it visible now and then and hopefully prevent future occurrences.

[via Destructoid's continuing coverage]



View full post on MobileCrunch

POSTED ON January 22, 2011, , , , , , , , ,

Comments:25

Leave my own
  1. Melvin Samuel Reply
    11/01/22

    Just a quick note. The game was removed from “What’s Hot” section yesterday evening and shortly thereafter it was removed from the AppStore completely.

  2. tatsuke Reply
    11/01/22

    Posting items on EBay doesn’t require an approval process.

  3. John Reply
    11/01/22

    Apple doesn’t care. Its about the money. If a ripoff sells, it makes them money. End of story.

  4. Dilan Reply
    11/01/22

    Interesting, I searched for this application. And it seems it has been removed? I can’t find it under “EdisonGame”. Were you successful?

  5. Jake Reply
    11/01/22

    You’d be on their ass? What the heck are you doing writing about IP issues for a tech blog? The proper response is send a DMCA notification to Apple if there are copyright violations. If the developer hasn’t done that, they have no reason to bitch. If they have done that, then they have grounds to sue Apple.

    You’d be on their ass. 7th grade much?

  6. Popo Reply
    11/01/22

    As an independent developer, I have to say that our experiences with this problem were entirely different.

    Another developer attempted to use our IP – in this case, a registered trademark. We notified the offending developer and they ignored us.

    We then notified Apple, and received a response a day later that the developer had been notified and was at risk of losing their dev account.

    The offending app was renamed almost immediately.

    Granted, our situation involved a trademark which is easily searchable via a TESS search. But in our experience, Apple’s legal team was both responsible and quick on the draw.

  7. Nick Reply
    11/01/22

    How do you feel about movie remakes, and should theaters take them down when someone complains of seeing “a movie like that” before?

  8. CornHolio Reply
    11/01/22

    This post shouldnt be focused on blaming Apple. It should point fingers at the the real douche here which is the developer of the iOS knockoff (EdisonGame) as well as these other companies who make their entire living copying popular apps (see FreeTheApps). It’s sickening, but deep down I feel sorry for these developers who can’t come up with their own ideas.

  9. jb Reply
    11/01/22

    Apple can’t police IP issues between parties. Too much work and would likely get them into trouble.

    The types of IP involved here could be:

    a) copyright – if either copyrighted code was stolen OR alleged infringing app used protected materials (the look, characters, story, etc. – like a movie infringing another movie)

    b) patents – not clear if any involve, but if so many would likely be criticizing the patent owner.

    c) trade dress- a form of trademark, can rely on common law rights and could be applicable here – does the other app look confusing similar to the first app?

    d) trade secrets – not likely relevant

    In the end, all for innovators protecting their innovations, but not sure its Apple’s job to police.

  10. afriend Reply
    11/01/22

    Huh? One’s on PC and the other is iOS, who cares?

    There’s literally THOUSANDS of iOS games that are clones of PC or web-based games. For example, Galaxy on Fire 2:
    http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/galaxy-on-fire-2/id397127539?mt=8

    is a direct copy of Freelancer:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freelancer_(video_game)

    But what about all the games that aren’t released to iOS? A guy made a flOw clone for iOS called Aquatica back in 2009 but was sued so the game was pulled and NO ONE made a flOw for iOS so we’re still sitting and waiting 2 years later:
    http://www.1up.com/news/iphone-app-accused-copying-flow

  11. Ryan Reply
    11/01/22

    I had something similar to this happen and I hired a lawyer to work with Apple. It was relatively inexpensive and Apple was pretty easy to work with.

    Its lame that stuff like this happens but it is way worse over in the android store. At least on iOS you have people at Apple to work with.

  12. PXLated Reply
    11/01/22

    This article would ONLY make sense if Apple was not co-operating even after legal notices

  13. Nitin Reply
    11/01/22

    You said it!

    Looks like there are still some people out there who are not happy enough with the height of the wall in Apple’s “walled garden”!

  14. Nitin Reply
    11/01/22

    Whatever it is, as long as you think your IP has been infringed, its your duty to take care of the problem. Apple is responsible to give you all the details, co-operate with you to the fullest extent, only when you have
    1) The IP
    2) An authorization from a legal authority that compels Apple to support you in your case.

    This article would make sense if Apple was not co-operating even after legal notices.

  15. Jackson Reply
    11/01/22

    If they were able to acquire some sort of legal copyright, I’d say heck yeah they should take action against the rippers-off.

    If not, tough pixels. Because it’s an app, and an app is just an app. Things can be duplicated. Apple just provides a spot for them to sell, weeding out crap and inAPPropriates.

    Now it’s up to the developer to make sure the quality of their original product is kept high enough to make it worth buying over the knock-off.

  16. McBeese Reply
    11/01/22

    Devin – what you define as ‘blatant’ and ‘pretty clear’ is just opinion, like it or not.

    You write: “A week ago, Apple was notified that the game was clearly made entirely from stolen IP”

    Notified by whom? A court of law? A lawyer representing an active case? Or someone else with an ‘opinion’?

    You write: “It’s pretty clear this is direct theft. The assets are stolen right out of the original game.”

    So were the assets protected by copyright? Has it been proven which company has the prior art (not which company went to market first)?

    If the rip-off is as obvious as you suggest, it should make for an easy court case. If not, then who knows. People already complain about Apple’s high-handed control. Are you suggesting that Apple should also play judge and jury on matters of IP ownership? I hope not. Let’s leave that to the courts please.

  17. Devin Coldewey Reply
    11/01/22

    You’re damn right. If you’d created something from scratch and someone stole it and was making money off it with Apple’s blessing, I’d be on their ass from day one and hounding them every single day.

    Like I said, when things like this happen, it makes it seem as if Apple is unable to keep their house in order, or worse, can’t be bothered to. They’re making money off a fraudulent product that they are actively offering and promoting. That warrants more concern than it appears they have, and that is the problem. If this becomes a regular thing, the platform becomes untrustable. Of course, I said all this in the article..

  18. Mark Reply
    11/01/22

    You see that “(c) 2010 Halfbot.com” at the bottom? Take it to the judge! The background image is enough to take them to the cleaners.

    I don’t know if it’s Apple’s job to do that. Probably not. If you have IP you need to defend it instead of depending on someone else to do it for you. They could still be selling it on Cydia for all you know.

    You may ask Apple for the legal address of the infringing party though, so the lawyers can provide them with the legal claim.

  19. William Palmer Reply
    11/01/22

    It is the responsibility of the shop to ensure that goods sold in it are fit for purpose and legal.

    When it comes to selling fraudulent goods the company whose goods are being faked can sue both the faker and the shop, especially when, like in this case, they have been told that the goods are fake, it is obvious that they are a blantant copy, and have not withdrawn them. The least the should do is withdraw the app until the situation is resolved.

  20. Devin Coldewey Reply
    11/01/22

    It’s pretty clear this is direct theft. The assets are stolen right out of the original game.

  21. Pete Reply
    11/01/22

    In this case, it might be true that the original flash developer is indeed in the right.

    However, that may not always be the case. The developer complaining may have stolen it from some one else, or the from the supposedly “offending” developer.

    Apple has no responsibility to judge third party IP issues.

    The flash developer should just directly sue the offending developer.

  22. MikeB Reply
    11/01/22

    Thought I’d seen that. The clone is showing for me in the “What’s Hot” section of the Featured tab.

  23. William Palmer Reply
    11/01/23

    Cloning an idea doesn’t include using exactly the same name as the original. That is what is called creating a fake, and is illegal.

  24. William Palmer Reply
    11/01/23

    If a shop is knowingly selling counterfeit goods then the shop is liable.

    If a online store is knowingly selling software blatantly ripped off from someone else, they have been informed about i and yet still continue to sell it they should be just as liable.

  25. Benjamin Kerensa Reply
    11/01/23

    IP Theft is a allegation…. copying or cloning is more reasonable but unless a app is blatantly using identical copies of code, graphics or infringing on a patent then no IP theft has occured.

    Copyright law allows modification of original works to a degree in which they are no longer protected under copyright but instead become derivative works and are not the intellectual property of the source creator.

    Is it ethical? Maybe not but lets remember that this goes on all day…. Hulu… Netflix… streaming video? FilmLove? Nothing is unique or original these days… people just clone ideas or improve upon someone else’s idea.

Leave a Reply

Trackbacks:0

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
Blatant IP Theft In App Store Garners Little Response From Apple (Updated) from Funlimited
TOP